Before a single tag goes on an asset, ARK runs a feasibility study. We talk to the operator, walk the floor, look at the assets, and tell you whether RFID is the right call — including the cases where it isn't.
A solutions architect spends one to three days on your floor — talking to operators, watching how assets move, and identifying the points where current tracking breaks down. Output: a written discovery doc with photos, observations, and quantified pain points.

We bring readers and a sample of tag form-factors to your floor and test read rates on your actual assets, your actual interference, your actual conditions. The output is a feasibility report with quantified read-rate estimates and a go/no-go recommendation.

We build an ROI model specific to your operation: current write-off rates, labor hours spent on inventory, audit cost, and quantified shrink. The model surfaces what RFID would save — and what it wouldn't — at multiple deployment scales.

Photos, operator quotes, pain-point quantification, and current-state workflow diagrams. Reads like an operator's-eye view of where things go wrong today.
Read-rate estimates per asset class, tag form-factor recommendations, reader topology sketches, and a go/no-go with confidence intervals.
Custom spreadsheet model with deployment scenarios, sensitivity analysis, and payback periods. Built so your finance team can stress-test the assumptions.
A consultation & needs assessment engagement typically leads into one of these — depending on the outcome and how the operator wants to scope the work.
The first thirty minutes is free. If RFID isn't the right call, we'll say so — and tell you what is.